Path: rQ!rQdQ!remarQ73!remarQ-uK!remarQ.com!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newshub.bart.net!news.bart.net!news.bart.net!not-for-mail
From: Heber Jentzch <anonymous@nym.cypherpunks.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology,alt.scientology
Subject: NOTs part 6
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:24:17 -0500
Organization: bART Internet Services
Lines: 698
Message-ID: <36E44001.C917F96B@nym.cypherpunks.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mickey.2005.bart.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: freyja.bart.nl 920906370 19163 194.158.161.8 (8 Mar 1999 15:19:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bart.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 1999 15:19:30 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: rQ alt.religion.scientology:548488 alt.clearing.technology:68703


                                  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                                   Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead,
Sussex 

                                   HCO BULLETIN OF 1 DECEMBER 1980 

                                                 
                                         NED for OTs Series 49

                                         C O N F I D E N T I A L

                                  ACKNOWLEDGING THE "ME" ANSWER 



                (Ref:  NOTs Series 7, VALENCES
                       NOTs Series 47, VALENCE TECHNIQUE
                                       ADDITION)

            This HCOB gives an additional step to the NOTs Valence
Technique, and a further clarification of each
      of the steps of this technique. 

            The new step consists of "acknowledging the "me" answer".
Doing so can guarantee a blow. 

            A lot of the time there is nothing there to acknowledge
because it has already blown. Most of the time
      this isn't needed, but when used it does prevent a hang-up when
the BT hasn't gone. So its actual value is
      the fact that it can guarantee a blow. 

            (By the way, you can call one back and acknowledge it, but
don't get into that. This is mentioned simply
      because it is possible to call them back.) 

      THE FULL STEPS OF THE VALENCE TECHNIQUE 

      O. Identifying what you are going to handle. 

            Although this is strictly speaking not part of the Valence
Technique, one has to start off by finding a BT
      or cluster that you are going to blow with the NOTs Valence
Technique. This zero step then consists of
      whatever action one is on, such as Rudiments, a NOTs Program Step,
Repair List or whatever, that uncovers
      a reading charge that one identifies as a BT or cluster. Having
found a reading charge one has to identify
      what that charge is coming from, i.e. a BT or a cluster (and less
commonly, "a BT that thinks it's a cluster", or
      "a cluster that thinks it's a BT"). 

            This step varies depending on what Program step or category
you are working on. E.g. on Program Step
      #17, "Mass Mistaken For the Mass of the Body", you ask the Pre-OT
to "Look over the body and tell me if
      there is any mass." or "...any massy body part or area?", or
"...any area of the body that is solid?". When
      you get a reading area of mass, you then need to identify what
this is, i.e. "Is it a BT?", "Is it a cluster?". 

            On Step #18, "BTs Being Body Parts", you have the Pre-OT
look over the various parts of the body until
      you get a reading body part. Or, you call off various parts, i.e.
"Head?", "Face?", "Neck?", "Inside?",
      "Outside?", etc. until you get a read. In this instance you have
the position or area of the body where the
      BT or cluster is, but still need to identify it by asking: a BT?,
a Cluster? (But note that in this instance as in
      the paragraph above, you have also found where the BT or Cluster
is in relation to the body). 

            But if you are flying ruds, or handling a prepared list, to
start with all you have is a reading question. You
      then find whose charge it is, (per HCOB 20 Deac 79 AUDITING
SOMEBODY UNDER CONSTANT AND
      CONTINUOUS PT STRESS and HCOB 22 Dec 79 FLYING RUDS AT OT III AND
ABOVE) by asking: "Is it
      yours?", "a BT's?, "a cluster's?" or , "Is it also _________'s?".
This action identifies what you have found
      and are now going to handle. 

            This is really a preliminary step to the Valence Technique
in which you are (a) finding something to run,
      and (b) identifying what you have found. You are establishing
whether it is "a BT", "a cluster", maybe
      "several BTs", or even "more than one cluster", (in the case of a
plural, the Pre-OT would need to be told to
      limit his attention to one of these, so you can handle one at a
time.) 

            Having found a charge and identified what it is, you now can
move into the Valence Technique to blow
      that BT or cluster (unless it has already blown by this point,
which is quite often so, many blow by
      inspection, especially if the Pre-OT is running cleanly and
rapidly). 

      1. "Where is the BT (or cluster)?" 

            The auditor has the Pre-OT locate where the BT or cluster is
by position in relation to the body. The
      auditor notes the area named by the Pre-OT and whether it reads.
When the Pre-OT names the correct place
      it will read. Do not let the Pre-OT go on looking for additional
new areas until the reading area is fully
      handled. 

            (As noted above under Step 0, you may have already located
where the BT is, in which case you
      wouldn't then ask the Pre-OT to find where t is.) 

            The location of a BT or cluster is not always in the body,
they can also be on the body, outside the
      body, even at some distance from the body. 

            Steps 0 and 1 are not rote. These steps are done to then
enable the Pre-OT to limit his attention span to
      the specific BT or cluster while asking the auditing question.
Otherwise you could jump from BT to BT,
      restimulating other areas than that being worked on. 

      2. "What are you?" 

            (Note that any and all listing done follows the HCOB 1 Aug
68 THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING.
      These have not changed just because they are being used in a
different process. An auditor who does not
      know these should not attempt this step, and should master this
HCOB before attemtping this step.) 

            The auditor has the Pre-OT ask the BT or cluster the
question, and relay the answer to the auditor, who
      writes the answer down and notes whether it read. Only if the
first item does not read, do you list further
      items. Very often the first answer reads and that is the item. 

            If the first item did not read, you've now got to ask him
for another answer, an you have got to make sure
      that it comes from that exact spot or area. You have got to make
sure that he isn't shifting his attention all
      over his "left side", or you'd get the whole bank in that area
alive. You could say: "Now, from that same
      spot, is there another answer? another? another?". And this is
done only to the first reading item. You
      might have to verify it: "Is that (answer) from the same spot?". 

            This is why you establish where the BT or cluster is located
in Step 1, as you can then ensure that the
      Pre-OT limits his attention to, and directs the auditing question
to, that exact spot. E.g. "Put your attention
      on the top of your left ear and ask "What are you?" 

            The auditor indicates the first reading item. (Don't forget
that the PreOT can't see the meter, and the
      auditor must say what read, and must not let the Pre-OT overlist.)
You indicate the item by saying "Pc
      wording of the first reading item") is the item". Don't get sloppy
and say "That's the item", as how does he
      know what you mean by "that"? If "catfish" was the item say,
"Catfish is the item", 

            Normally, but not always, you will get an F/N on finding and
indicating the item, but if you do not get an
      F/N here, you will on the next step. 

            (Warning: On this step remember that you may have already
received the answer in Step 0 or Step 1. BTs
      and clusters may not be aware of the fact that they are living
beings and may not release any charge at all on
      "BT" or "cluster". But when you ask where they are, you may have
gotten an answer to what they are
      being, simply by asking for body locations. This is not common,
but not uncommon either: you asked if the
      BT was on his foot and you got a big read. In this What step you
might have trouble getting a reading item
      and might miss the fact that you already had the reading item for
his What step in "foot". The BT was being
      a foot and you discovered it by accident without recognizing it,
so if you have any trouble with the What
      step, one of the first things to check is whether or not a "What"
already read on asking for the "Where" on
      Step 0 or Step 1. If you suspect this, put the named body part
that read on the list and check it out as part of
      the list. You won't have to do this often, but you better know
about it.) 

      3. Acknowledgement 

            The auditor has the Pre-OT acknowledge the item. This is
very important (see NOTs Series 7). 

            Even if you got an F/N on the previous step, you still
acknowledge and you will broaden the F/N. And if
      you didn't get an F/N previously, you will on acknowledging the
item. And you'll quite often get a blow on
      this step. 

      4. "Who are you?" 

            Now we have to remember that it is the same spot again and
we ask, "Who are you?", and we don't feed
      them the answer. They sometimes comm lag (don't get impatient with
the comm lag), sometimes it's a few
      seconds comm lag, and then you get the answer. You may have to
repeat he question. The "Me" answer will
      normally LFBD, and if that LFBD isn't very marked, you make sure
you do the next step of acknowledging
      the "Me" answer. In any event you could still acknowledge, but if
the LFBD was pronounced the
      probability is that he's gone. 

            Now there is a special condition you can run into on the
"Who are you?" question if the BT answers
      with a significance or identity answer. This is covered in NOTs
Series 7. But if this continues, suspect that
      you may have gotten a wrong item on the "What are you?" question,
or that the Pre-OT has used too broad
      an attention span or let his attention wander to other areas and
he is getting answers from other BTs or
      Clusters. 

      5. Acknowledgement 

            The auditor has the PreOT acknowledge the BT's "Me"answer.
This action can guarantee a blow. 

            Now if this acknowledgement produces another read then we
know it guaranteed a blow. Sometimes you
      get another LFBD on the acknowledgment step, and sometimes you get
a broadening of the F/N. 

            And that completes the steps of the NOTs Valence Technique. 

      CAUTION 

            Sometimes, quite often in fact, this short-circuits. You
ask: "What are you?" and the guy says "Me" and
      blows. And Sometimes you are patiently trying to go through all
these steps and you get a series of blows.
      A blow or a series of blows can occur at any time during NOTs. You
don't then continue the steps of this
      Technique, as that BT or cluster has gone! Sometimes a series of
blows or an automatic blow will go into a
      Persistent F/N or a Floating Tone Arm and in either instance you
would end off the session. 

            Also you can get repetitive blows if a case is running
pretty clean, and you can get blows without BDs.
      There isn't much left on the charge and it isn't registering on
the meter to amount to anything. 

            There is also the case of a "partial blow" and the
description and handling for this is given in NOTs
      Series 45, HCOB 10 Feb 79 PARTIALLY BLOWN BTS. 

            On "Hello and OK" you sometimes get a blow. The BT or
cluster doesn't answer up and you run "Hellos
      and OKs" repetitively to get it into comm. Rarely, it will
suddenly blow, and it would then be senseless to go
      on trying to run "Hello and OK" or anything else, as that one has
gone. 

            Some auditors have been known to ask a pc if it blew, during
the Valence Technique steps. Even nag the
      PreOT, "Did it blow?", "Has it gone?", "Still around?". This could
be due to the auditor's unfamiliarity with
      his meter, and not recognizing a blow when he sees it occur on the
meter. Or, possibly some may have
      confused another technique, Date/Locate, with this technique. You
of course always Date to blow, and
      Locate to blow, and the auditor could get the idea that he should
carry over Date/Locate technique into the
      Valence Technique. 

            It is very poor practice to ask the PreOT if it blew during
NOTs Valence Technique. You could cause the
      BT or cluster to submerge or be suppressed, or you could
invalidate a blow that did occur. 

            This doesn't mean that you can't ever ask if it blew. You
could ask if it is "still around?" and a read would
      confirm that it is. But this type of question is asking for a
missingness. It's no longer there. There's a large
      number of pcs that never see the blow, and it isn't something to
see, because it's a missingness. This type of
      question can be difficult for the PreOT to answer, as there is now
nothing there for him to perceive as it has
      gone. If the meter BD'd and F/Ned on the "Me" step, it would be
idiocy to then ask if it blew, of course it
      did! But if your meter didn't tell you it blew, you could be in a
quandary and have to solve that problem. But
      you wouldn't interrupt the Valence Technique to ask if it blew,
and you wouldn't get into nagging the
      PreOT. You just follow on through your steps, and particularly if
you had the PreOT ack the "Me" answer,
      then you got your blow alright. So this concern about whether the
BT blew is misplaced. 

            These points are stated so that the auditor will understand
what he is doing, why he is doing it, and what
      manifestation he can expect to occur, because these manifestations
will occur. This technique is a very
      positive series of steps, and they go in that sequence. If these
steps are done as given, you will get the
      result, and if departed from or if there is an error, you can
definitely expect to get that manifestation too, i.e.
      too broad an attention span and you will get restim. 

            It is necessary that the auditor and C/S understand these
points as this is not a technique that can be
      done rotely or robotically. 

      OT III TECHNIQUES 

            Sometimes you will need to use OT III techniques, especially
when you run into a cluster. And it is
      effective, just like it always was. You sometimes get into a
situation where you have an inert mass. You run
      some "Hellos and OKs" and it actually becomes less inert, but it
is still a cluster. That condition can exist
      but it usually isn't untied with "Hello & OK". It's a cluster and
it reads on cluster. Then it's your assessment
      for mutual incident, "Accident?, Illness?, Impact?, Injury?,
etc.", you do the assessment of what is this
      thing. You get your mutual incident. Sometimes the cluster will
explode apart or break up on the assessment
      alone. You found what was holding it together. Then you wouldn't
try to Date/Locate it. You'd have the
      PreOT pick off individuals and run them on the Valence Technique.
But if there was no disintegration of the
      cluster on finding the mutual incident, you'd carry right on and
Date/Locate, Inc II and Inc Is (or NOTs
      Valence Technique). 

            Now there's a variation on mutual incidents. You can get a
mutual incident that is current, contemporary,
      like he went PTS or something. Had a big ARC break or something.
But it isn't as strenuous as a
      cluster-making incident. It's a sort of a lock. It isn't a mutual
incident like an impact, injury, illness, accident,
      shock, etc. But a guy can run into a recent heavy upset or general
charge of some kind, heavy stress, and
      you get the reaction described in HCOB 20 Dec 79 NOTs Series 48,
under "Routine A". There you had a
      general total restim - it is actually a mutual incident as it
happened to all of them - it's near PT though and
      they all copy it, and when you hit it you get a sudden BD and a
relief. But you are not going to blow any
      BTs to amount to anything as it isn't a cluster-making incident.
So you have to be able to differentiate
      between these two types of mutual incidents, the recent this life
lock, and the heavy impact, injury,
      explosion type of mutual incident that forms a cluster. The
cluster will resolve with the OT III, mutual
      incident, Date/Locate, Inc II and Inc Is routine. And that's why
you start off on the NOTs course with a
      re-study and clear up any MUs on the OT III [missing line or page] 

            The original research on somatics was done in the late '50's
in Washington, and I found how a somatic
      comes about. It's based on the fact that one being by himself
couldn't have a somatic. You have to have two
      beings to have a somatic. A cluster can have a somatic. You
wouldn't ask a question for a BT with a somatic,
      that would be a wrong question and is based on a false datum, and
is an out-tech question. You could have
      two or more BTs smashed together somehow producing a somatic, but
you would have to take up each of
      these BTs individually to blow them. 

            But usually about the only time you will run into a somatic
in NOTs is when there has been an error. A
      wrong item, or something of that sort. It may be that a somatic in
NOTs is always an indicator of an error. It
      seems to be so. And the wise auditor on NOTs should be alerted to
the probability of an error of some kind
      if the Pre-OT does turn on a somatic. You can easily and quickly
check for an error in what you have just
      been running in the session, or use a NOTs Repair List to locate
and handle the BPC. 

      UNDERSTANDING 

            It is very essential that NOTs auditors and C/Ses understand
the NOTs materials, and don't try to insist
      on a rote set of questions or steps, as NOTs doesn't run well as a
rote or robotic rundown. That are very
      exact steps and manifestations and sequences and you will get
these everytime. Anytime there have been
      flubbed cases on NOTs these have traced to MU's on the part of the
auditor and/or C/S. The NOTs course
      checksheet was specificially designed to prevent this with
Supervisor meter checks for MU words
      frequently throughout the checksheet. But there was an instance of
a student who "skipped" the MU word
      check by the Supervisor, which is a sure route to catastrophe. Any
trouble on NOTs has traced back to
      failure to clear words misunderstood in either the OT III
materials or in the NOTs materials. This gives the
      solution to any auditor or C/S troubles with NOTs. Clear the MU
words, and re-study the materials so that
      you do understand and can apply them. It will certainly make your
life as an auditor or C/S much easier, and
      will enable you to get the rave results that NOTs is known for
routinely. 

      SOCIOLOGICAL IMPACT 

            Have you considered the sociological impact that you are
having by auditing NOTs? You are turning
      free beings loose in torrents. This is bound to have an effect on
society, especially when these start picking
      up bodies and turn up to join the team at their local org! You are
not just auditing one pc at this level, you
      are churning out cleared beings in volume, and we will start
seeing the results sooner or later on society in
      general. Maybe you have thought about this too, it's nice to
recognize the good effects you are creating! 


       

                                       L. RON HUBBARD
                                       FOUNDER


      LRH:dm:kjm
      Copyright (c) 1978
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 




                    

      LIMITED
      DISTRIBUTION
      NOTs Auditors &
      C/Ses ONLY 
                                  HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
                                   Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead,
Sussex 

                                   HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JANUARY 1980 

                                                 
                                         NED for OTs Series 50

                                         C O N F I D E N T I A L

                                      NOTs OT DRUG RUNDOWN 


            


                 (Ref: HCOB 29 Jan 80 THE OT DRUG RUNDOWN
                 WHICH MUST BE STUDIED PRIOR TO STUDYING
                 THIS HCOB.)


            This issue adds to the OT III HCOB referenced above, and
gives additional data and handlings which are
      limited to NOTs auditors and C/Ses, and which are for use on cases
being audited on NOTs. (The OT III
      handlings of drugs can also be used on NOTs cases.) 

            As you know from NOTs data, BTs can be being anything. They
can be being a particular drug, or being
      a drug picture or incident, or even an "acid trip" for example. 

            The way you would handle a NOTs case on drugs is similar in
that you would first of all get the person
      through the Purification Rundown. A case already started on NOTs
can be put onto the Purification RD
      without having been completed on NOTs, in fact, you may not be
able to complete some cases without it.
      You do not have to take the case to a Rest Point. Just ensure that
the case is not left incomplete (or messed
      up) on a specific action or category before starting the
Purification RD. Then do not attempt to combine
      NOTs auditing with the Purification RD until it is completed. 

            Do not attempt to run Objective processes on a case during
NOTs. 

            The caution of not asking for Drugs or Drug incidents
generally also applies to NOTs auditing as such
      a question would result in a total restim. 

            What you can do is to add "Drugs" and "a BT being a drug",
"a BT affected by drugs", "a BT being a
      drug trip", "a BT being a drug picture", into a prepared
assessment or list. 

            You can check for a read on drugs on a specific BT or
cluster, and then handle that BT or cluster to a
      blow. 

            All of the data published on the subject of drugs and their
effect in preventing case gain applies to BTs
      and cluster's cases. 

            Most commonly drugs have shown up on NOTs cases as either
cluster-making incidents , or on
      individual BTs being the drug or affected by the drug, or copying
other BT or cluster pictures of drugs. 

            Several cases who were stalled on NOTs or who were making
minimal gain on NOTs have been resolved
      by handling drugs as described in this issue. 

      CASE HISTORIES 

            The following case histories (reported by FSO C/Ses), of
case handling done on NOTs Pre-OTs on drugs
      are limited to this issue as they contain NOTs techniques and
data. These are additional case histories to
      those given in HCOB 29 Jan 80, THE OT DRUG RUNDOWN, (those cases
were also piloted by NOTs
      auditors and C/Ses, but do not contain confidential NOTs data). 

      Case 1 : 

            "Institutional case who had Sodium Pentathol as an
anaethetic just prior to 'gong nuts' and then being
      put in an institution". 

            "Running NOTs techniques on this drug, BTs stuck in this
drug, BTs being this drug, BTs affected by
      this drug, turned the case sane." 

      Case 2 : 

            "LSD some 200 times. Had so far refused any standard Sweat
Out program. Case gain totally hung fire on
      his attempts to get the perception he had when he took LSD." 

            "From a GF 40 Expanded, drugs read heavily and his first
gains from NOTs were acheived in handling
      cluster-making incidents from LSD trips, BTs/clusters stuck in
LSD, being LSD, etc. This was run for
      approximately one intensive with Pre-OT interest. It didn't crack
the case but some headway was made." 

            (The next action for this case is to get him onto and
through the Purification RD, then the full NOTs OT
      Drug RD.) 

      Case 3 : 

            "LSD 220 to 250 times, and alcohol and other heavy street
drugs. He was a point where he could hardly
      walk or articulate". 

            "Many cluster-making incidents on drugs, LSD, alcohol, were
handled through the Rundown. Many
      were Reviv'd in past locations and some stuck there (i.e.
physically)". 

            "He cognited and BD'd on disturbing a pocket of acid held
down by a BT. BTs/clusters restimulated by
      that were handled, then BTs/clusters stuck in drug trips and
copies of drug trips". 

            "He started recovering physically. Articulation handled and
walking improved". 

            "On NOTs Series 34 handling of illness, alcohol was the
item. His speech went back to normal after this -
      Pre-OT felt tremendous". 

            "Lots of charge blown on BTs/clusters stuck in hospital drug
(ACTH). Result of less numb, more
      sensation". 

            "Later a NOTs Series 43 handling was done on alcohol, plus
Date/Locate of a cumulative cluster on
      drugs. His responsibility increased and he was off on a persistent
win for almost 2 weeks experiencing
      automatic/continuous blow phenomena in life". 

            "Lots of 'stuckness' on the case was tied up in drugs and
alcohol. Case is currently doing very well on
      the Purification RD". 

            (Although the Purification RD would normally precede such
drug handling in NOTs, this case was
      unable to walk or to talk due to paralysis and was considered
incurable by the medicos.) 



            "There are also a number of Pre-OTs who have had NOTs Series
12 handlings on Drug RDs and some on
      drugs." 



      NOTs OT DRUG RD PGM 

            THe NOTs or Drug RD Program is the same program as the OT
Drug RD (HCOB 29 Jan 80 THE OT
      DRUG RUNDOWN). It begins with the Purification RD, it has the same
Steps #1 - 5. But the method of
      handling is by NOTs Valence Technique, rather than Inc II, Inc I.
Assessment for mutal incident is the same,
      but individuals from a broken up cluster would be handled with
NOTs Valence Technique. 

            The categories of: "a BT or cluster being (reading drug) ",
"a BT or cluster affected by (reading drug) ",
      "a BT being a drug trip", "a BT being a drug picture", "a BT or
cluster being (mis-emotion) ", "a BT or
      cluster being (negative item) ", should also be checked for on
each reading drug taken up, and these
      categories may be assessed as part of a prepared list, and should
be so assessed at the end of Step 5. 

            Step 6 is different and would consist of a NOTs Series 24
Repair List assessed and handled, to clean up
      any loose ends and polish off the case, before returning to the
NOTs Advance Program. 

      ADMINISTRATION AND DELIVERY 

            The OT Drug Rd may not be audited on Pre-OTs who have had
any NOTs auditing, these may only be
      run on the NOTs OT Drug RD. 

            Although the NOTs OT Drug RD is done by a NOTs auditor and
NOTs C/S, these must be specially
      trained on the NOTs OT Drug RD and only interested, graduated NOTs
auditors and C/Ses may be so
      trained. These issues are not added to the ACS Courses, nor given
to green NOTs auditors or C/Ses.) 

            The NOTs OT drug Rundown is not mixed in with the NOTs
Advance Program, nor is it to be bit and
      pieced with NOTs, nor given as a blur along with NOTs. It is its
own special RD and must be delivered as its
      own RD, and as its own package. This does not mean that you cannot
use the item "drugs" in an
      assessment for a mutual incident during NOTs, nor that you
couldn't handle a BT hung up in a drug during
      NOTs. But if drugs or drug items are coming up during NOTs, then
the case is on the wrong program and
      should be shifted over to the Purification RD, followed by the
NOTs OT Drug RD. Then after these are
      done, you would resume the NOTs Advance Program. (As well as not
mixing the hours on the NOTs OT
      Drug RD with NOTs hours, there is an important Technical reason
for only handling one subject at a time
      and completing each action and program before starting another.
(ref: C/S Series 38, C/S Series 47, & NOTs
      Series 30.) 

            One would not interrupt a Pre-OT who is running well on NOTs
with good TA action and who is getting
      rapid blows, but would flatten the action before making a change
to the Purification RD and the NOTs OT
      Drug RD. These Rundowns can be done at any point during the NOTs
Advance Program, but ideally they
      would be entered after the "Past Auditing Repair" steps, or after
step 14, after step 15, or at any point
      thereafter. If drugs are heavily charged and getting in the way,
then you would have no choice but to shift
      programs to handle. 

            Ideally the NOTs OT Drug RD should be delivered by a
specialist team of NOTs auditors and C/S,
      operating as a unit, who then feed completed cases back to regular
and interning NOTs auditors. 

            The NOTs OT Drug Rundown should help you with cases who hung
fire or were resistive previously as
      well as speeding gains and results on all cases. 

            The pilot results are excellent, and show what sort of gains
can be attained. 


       

                                       L. RON HUBBARD
                                       FOUNDER

                                       As assisted by
                                       Senior C/S Int


      LRH:dm:kjm
      Copyright (c) 1978
      by L. Ron Hubbard
      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
